deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
Shop Similar Prints
This Print Not Available
Download Image
JPG, 900×600
more ▶

More from ~darkmatter257

Featured in Groups:

Details

December 24, 2008
434 KB
900×600
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 15
Favourites: 41 [who?]

Views: 752 (0 today)
Downloads: 27 (0 today)

Camera Data

Canon
Canon EOS Kiss X2
1/99 second
F/7.1
10 mm
200
Dec 22, 2008, 4:20:36 PM
[x]
:icondarkmatter257:
Kraljevica, Croatia

Eos 450D, Sigma 10-20, Tripod, no filter
Add a Comment:
 
:icondrewhopper:
*DrewHopper Apr 1, 2009  Professional Photographer
This would make a good avatar, lovely lighting and nice thirds :)
Reply
:iconlouiecablouie:
~louiecablouie Mar 9, 2009  Hobbyist Photographer
With no filter? Wow....:) That must have been amazing to see.
Reply
:icondarkmatter257:
~darkmatter257 Mar 11, 2009  Hobbyist Photographer
believe me, It was even more amazing to see it in real;)
Reply
:iconlouiecablouie:
~louiecablouie Mar 11, 2009  Hobbyist Photographer
:nod:
Reply
:iconguytz:
~guytz Feb 28, 2009   Photographer
amazing colors :+fav:
Reply
:iconsymp-thique:
great shot... have the same lens! :D
Reply
:icondarkmatter257:
~darkmatter257 Jan 5, 2009  Hobbyist Photographer
Thanks... but we don't have the same lens anymore ;)... I just bought canon 10-22.
Reply
:iconsymp-thique:
and why do you prefer the canon lens?, the aperture starts at 3,5 instead at f4 with the sigma but it's a lot of money for that little gain... or maybe not?
Reply
:icondarkmatter257:
~darkmatter257 Jan 8, 2009  Hobbyist Photographer
it's not about f value nor because it's Canon, simply put it: image quality. My choice at first was the same reason, money. I though same thing and bought sigma. Don't get me wrong, Sigma 10-20 is great lens, but when I saw shot with Canon 10-22 I couldn't believe the difference.
Than I decided to pay a little more and buy Canon lens. I have to say Sigma is really good and solid built, in my opinion better than Canon. It's heavier and better "lays" in hand;)
But with all that Sigma is no match to image quality of Canon lens, trust me :)
Reply
:iconsymp-thique:
i thought there was no great difference in optical quality between the sigma and canon lens... i'm afraid i can`t go nikon in the ultra-wide lens because there is no 10-20 in the nikon catalog, the closest thing is the 12-24 f3.5 that costs 1200 euros (more than two times the sigma) and i prefer a 10mm focal length

enjoy your lens! :D
Reply
Add a Comment: